IDE vs. ASGI
IDE (Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund) and ASGI (Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund) are both Industrials Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, IDE returned 13.42%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for ASGI. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDE charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for ASGI.
Performance
IDE vs. ASGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDE achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly higher than ASGI's 5.26% return.
IDE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 17.18%
- 6M
- 22.83%
- 1Y
- 36.83%
- 3Y*
- 26.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
ASGI
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 28.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
IDE vs. ASGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDE Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund | 17.18% | 35.77% | 11.96% | 22.04% | -16.54% | 26.27% | 15.85% |
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 5.26% | 44.20% | 10.26% | 14.48% | -10.50% | 18.17% | -0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDE and ASGI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.46 |
The correlation between IDE and ASGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDE vs. ASGI — Risk / Return Rank
IDE
ASGI
IDE vs. ASGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDE | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | 1.53 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 2.07 | +1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.28 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 1.87 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 6.76 | +2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDE | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 1.53 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.74 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IDE vs. ASGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDE drawdown since its inception was -52.43%, which is greater than ASGI's maximum drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDE and ASGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDE | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.43% | -23.71% | -28.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.34% | -15.15% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -16.24% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.36% | -23.71% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -9.05% | +8.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -5.90% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 4.19% | -0.20% |
Volatility
IDE vs. ASGI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE) is 2.63%, while Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that IDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDE | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 5.15% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 16.45% | -4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 18.52% | -4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.83% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 17.37% | +3.54% |
IDE vs. ASGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDE has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGI's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDE vs. ASGI - Dividend Comparison
IDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, less than ASGI's 11.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 11.54% | 10.96% | 12.84% | 8.03% | 8.25% | 6.33% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDE Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund | 9.36% | 10.57% | 12.11% | 9.00% | 9.99% | 7.58% | 8.89% | 9.02% | 16.46% | 6.88% | 10.67% | 12.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDE and ASGI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASGI has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to IDE (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDE dropped -52.43% vs ASGI's -23.71%.
IDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDE and ASGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer