PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IDBT.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDBT.L is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDBT.L achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IDBT.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 1.76%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.


IDBT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
6M
0.76%
YTD
0.76%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
1.76%

SGLN.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
-6.59%
6M
-12.14%
YTD
-5.86%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDBT.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.76%5.28%4.03%4.16%-3.71%-0.64%3.13%3.67%1.34%0.33%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-5.86%65.25%26.06%12.89%-0.12%-3.71%23.60%19.23%-1.55%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IDBT.L and SGLN.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDBT.L
IDBT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IDBT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDBT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDBT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IDBT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDBT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IDBT.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDBT.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.17

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

0.89

+3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.88

2.17

+14.71

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDBT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDBT.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDBT.L drawdown since its inception was -5.66%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -56.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDBT.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDBT.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-56.74%

+51.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

-24.59%

+23.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-24.59%

+23.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

-24.59%

+18.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.66%

-24.59%

+18.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.60%

+23.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-32.94%

+32.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

10.09%

-9.90%

Volatility

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IDBT.L) is 0.39%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that IDBT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDBT.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

6.98%

-6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

22.13%

-21.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21%

25.64%

-24.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

22.88%

-20.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.77%

18.87%

-17.10%

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDBT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDBT.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

IDBT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDBT.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
3.99%4.15%4.25%2.97%0.74%0.63%1.71%2.31%1.57%0.96%0.74%0.51%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDBT.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDBT.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDBT.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SGLN.L.

IDBT.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SGLN.L is Gold. IDBT.L tracks iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IDBT.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDBT.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer