IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L
IDAR.L (iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDAR.L is a REIT fund tracking the iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDAR.L returned 1.36%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDAR.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDAR.L is traded in USD, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDAR.L achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IDAR.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 1.36%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.
IDAR.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.60%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDAR.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | -3.46% | 30.42% | -10.04% | -2.19% | -12.15% | 4.47% | -8.54% | 15.87% | -2.04% | 18.26% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.64% | 17.63% | 25.22% | 26.11% | -18.77% | 29.88% | 17.14% | 31.49% | -5.65% | 21.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDAR.L and CSP1.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2010 | 0.51 |
The correlation between IDAR.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDAR.L
CSP1.L
IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IDAR.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDAR.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.33 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 2.55 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 10.42 | -9.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDAR.L drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDAR.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDAR.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -33.51% | -34.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -8.68% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.88% | -19.33% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.96% | -25.16% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.83% | -33.51% | -6.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.14% | -0.22% | -10.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -4.07% | -13.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.39% | 2.13% | +4.26% |
Volatility
IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IDAR.L) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 3.12%. This indicates that IDAR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDAR.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 3.12% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 8.66% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 11.64% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 20.99% | -6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 18.84% | -3.31% |
IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDAR.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDAR.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
IDAR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDAR.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | 3.66% | 3.38% | 4.23% | 3.74% | 3.74% | 3.06% | 3.22% | 2.93% | 3.42% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDAR.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IDAR.L.
IDAR.L is categorized as REIT, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. IDAR.L tracks iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IDAR.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for IDAR.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer