ICVT vs. PRFD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD).
ICVT and PRFD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICVT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. It was launched on Jun 2, 2015. PRFD is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jan 18, 2023.
Performance
ICVT vs. PRFD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICVT vs. PRFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 3.58% | 18.10% | 10.61% | 11.89% |
PRFD PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | -0.68% | 8.45% | 9.92% | 1.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICVT achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly higher than PRFD's -0.68% return.
ICVT
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
PRFD
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICVT vs. PRFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFD's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICVT vs. PRFD — Risk / Return Rank
ICVT
PRFD
ICVT vs. PRFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICVT | PRFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.73 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.24 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.82 | +1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | 6.38 | +4.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICVT | PRFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.73 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.23 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICVT and PRFD is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ICVT vs. PRFD - Dividend Comparison
ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than PRFD's 5.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.62% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
PRFD PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 5.74% | 5.63% | 5.53% | 5.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICVT vs. PRFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICVT drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than PRFD's maximum drawdown of -11.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICVT and PRFD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICVT | PRFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -11.93% | -21.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -3.28% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -2.65% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -2.30% | -7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 0.94% | +1.27% |
Volatility
ICVT vs. PRFD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) at 1.64%. This indicates that ICVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICVT | PRFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 1.64% | +5.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 2.42% | +9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 3.55% | +10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 4.94% | +8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 4.94% | +10.60% |