PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICRC vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICRC vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICRC achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.67% return.


ICRC

1D
-8.76%
1M
-16.63%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-7.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.44%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.79%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICRC vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ICRC
Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF
-5.38%-36.21%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.67%3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ICRC and PEPS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICRC vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICRC

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICRC vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ICRC vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICRCPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

1.05

-1.84

Drawdowns

ICRC vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICRC drawdown since its inception was -55.65%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICRC and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICRCPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.65%

-21.26%

-34.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.04%

-0.51%

-40.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.47%

-2.77%

-29.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

Volatility

ICRC vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICRCPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.59%

13.06%

+54.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.59%

18.31%

+49.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.59%

18.31%

+49.28%

ICRC vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICRC has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICRC vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

ICRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.62%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ICRC
Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF
42.62%17.79%0.00%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICRC and PEPS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICRC.

ICRC has the higher dividend yield at 42.62%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICRC and 0.10% for PEPS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICRC and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer