PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOM.L achieves a 24.73% return, which is significantly higher than IGIL.L's 0.97% return.


ICOM.L

1D
-1.26%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
24.73%
6M
24.19%
1Y
37.66%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*

IGIL.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.02%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
-2.27%
10Y*
1.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICOM.L
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
24.73%16.45%5.07%-8.06%14.83%27.05%-3.74%6.75%-10.19%5.58%
IGIL.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.97%8.45%-2.93%5.08%-21.84%2.94%12.21%7.81%-4.02%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOM.L and IGIL.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017

0.14

The correlation between ICOM.L and IGIL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOM.L
ICOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ICOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IGIL.L
IGIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IGIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IGIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICOM.LIGIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.11

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

1.10

+4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

3.08

+9.07

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the IGIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOM.L and IGIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICOM.LIGIL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

0.62

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

-0.24

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.19

+0.36

Drawdowns

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOM.L drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than IGIL.L's maximum drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOM.L and IGIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOM.LIGIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-31.32%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-3.44%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.40%

-8.47%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.74%

-31.32%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-14.80%

+9.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-7.47%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.23%

+1.86%

Volatility

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to iShares Global Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGIL.L) at 2.09%. This indicates that ICOM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOM.LIGIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

2.09%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

4.60%

+10.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.90%

6.16%

+10.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

9.63%

+6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

8.91%

+6.32%

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOM.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IGIL.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICOM.L vs. IGIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ICOM.L nor IGIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ICOM.L and IGIL.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICOM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICOM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IGIL.L.

ICOM.L is categorized as Commodities, while IGIL.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ICOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index), while IGIL.L tracks Bloomberg World Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ICOM.L and 0.20% for IGIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOM.L and IGIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer