ICMUX vs. PFN
Compare and contrast key facts about Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN).
ICMUX is managed by Intrepid Funds. It was launched on Jul 1, 2007. PFN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Oct 27, 2004.
Performance
ICMUX vs. PFN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICMUX vs. PFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICMUX Intrepid Income Fund | -0.24% | 8.16% | 10.43% | 10.90% | -3.17% | 10.02% | 8.77% | 4.65% | 0.53% | 3.79% |
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II | -5.40% | 13.07% | 15.72% | 15.43% | -17.65% | 5.14% | 3.97% | 21.84% | 0.94% | 20.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICMUX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than PFN's -5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ICMUX has underperformed PFN with an annualized return of 5.93%, while PFN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.36% annualized return.
ICMUX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 6.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.93%
PFN
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -3.80%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICMUX vs. PFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICMUX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than PFN's 1.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICMUX vs. PFN — Risk / Return Rank
ICMUX
PFN
ICMUX vs. PFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICMUX | PFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 0.20 | +2.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 0.34 | +3.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.06 | +0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 0.26 | +2.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 1.02 | +9.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICMUX | PFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 0.20 | +2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.35 | 0.21 | +2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.30 | 0.46 | +1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.04 | 0.28 | +1.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICMUX and PFN is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ICMUX vs. PFN - Dividend Comparison
ICMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.03%, less than PFN's 12.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICMUX Intrepid Income Fund | 7.03% | 7.96% | 7.85% | 9.10% | 8.17% | 5.99% | 5.56% | 3.35% | 3.07% | 2.86% | 3.01% | 3.53% |
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II | 12.51% | 11.49% | 11.57% | 11.92% | 12.19% | 9.71% | 9.67% | 9.07% | 10.81% | 9.20% | 10.12% | 11.74% |
Drawdowns
ICMUX vs. PFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICMUX drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum PFN drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMUX and PFN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICMUX | PFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -80.08% | +71.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -10.77% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.64% | -33.45% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.77% | -45.70% | +36.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -6.42% | +5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -11.89% | +11.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 2.79% | -2.17% |
Volatility
ICMUX vs. PFN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) is 0.77%, while PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that ICMUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICMUX | PFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 6.57% | -5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.38% | 8.43% | -7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 13.35% | -10.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 14.75% | -12.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.58% | 18.16% | -15.58% |