PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICMPX vs. LZFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) and Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICMPX achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly higher than LZFIX's -3.61% return.


ICMPX

1D
0.66%
1M
2.31%
YTD
-1.64%
6M
-0.82%
1Y
-0.54%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*

LZFIX

1D
1.02%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-3.61%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
-11.75%
3Y*
1.81%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ICMPX
Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio
-1.64%11.70%5.62%17.84%-20.11%10.02%23.95%13.70%
LZFIX
Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio
-3.61%4.09%-3.09%18.84%-5.29%22.88%1.15%9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ICMPX and LZFIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019

0.69

The correlation between ICMPX and LZFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICMPX vs. LZFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICMPX
ICMPX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ICMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ICMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

LZFIX
LZFIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
LZFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
LZFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) and Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICMPXLZFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.01

-0.79

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.08

-1.02

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.88

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.55

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.09

-1.01

+0.92

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the LZFIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMPX and LZFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICMPXLZFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

-0.79

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.13

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.28

+0.27

Drawdowns

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMPX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum LZFIX drawdown of -41.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMPX and LZFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICMPXLZFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-41.91%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-21.51%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-21.51%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.70%

-21.69%

-13.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-15.15%

+9.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-6.98%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

11.87%

-6.48%

Volatility

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) is 3.47%, while Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that ICMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICMPXLZFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

4.71%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

10.53%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

14.89%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

17.76%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

21.10%

-3.46%

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICMPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than LZFIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Dividend Comparison

ICMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than LZFIX's 21.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ICMPX
Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio
4.42%4.35%2.92%0.62%1.07%2.04%0.87%2.47%
LZFIX
Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio
21.66%20.87%14.95%8.68%12.81%15.59%1.12%5.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICMPX and LZFIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZFIX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to ICMPX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMPX dropped -34.70% vs LZFIX's -41.91%.

ICMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICMPX and LZFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer