PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICMPX vs. LZFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) and Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ICMPX
Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio
-11.59%11.70%5.62%17.84%-20.11%10.02%23.95%13.70%
LZFIX
Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio
-10.00%4.09%-3.09%18.84%-5.29%22.88%1.15%9.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICMPX achieves a -11.59% return, which is significantly lower than LZFIX's -10.00% return.


ICMPX

1D
0.33%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
-11.59%
6M
-13.07%
1Y
-3.07%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*

LZFIX

1D
0.93%
1M
-9.50%
YTD
-10.00%
6M
-15.90%
1Y
-12.42%
3Y*
-0.05%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICMPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than LZFIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ICMPX vs. LZFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICMPX
ICMPX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ICMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ICMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

LZFIX
LZFIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
LZFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
LZFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) and Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICMPXLZFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.25

-0.78

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.24

-1.00

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.88

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

-0.58

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.00

-1.28

+0.28

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is higher than the LZFIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMPX and LZFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICMPXLZFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

-0.78

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.17

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.23

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between ICMPX and LZFIX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Dividend Comparison

ICMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than LZFIX's 23.19% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ICMPX
Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio
4.92%4.35%2.92%0.62%1.07%2.04%0.87%2.47%
LZFIX
Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio
23.19%20.87%14.95%8.68%12.81%15.59%1.12%5.78%

Drawdowns

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMPX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum LZFIX drawdown of -41.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMPX and LZFIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ICMPXLZFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-41.91%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-21.51%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.70%

-21.69%

-13.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.17%

-20.78%

+5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-6.74%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

9.69%

-5.34%

Volatility

ICMPX vs. LZFIX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) at 3.94%. This indicates that ICMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ICMPXLZFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

3.94%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

10.63%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

15.86%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

17.63%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

21.22%

-3.57%