ICMPX vs. GSIMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ICMPX (Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ICMPX returned 1.16%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for GSIMX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICMPX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.

Performance

ICMPX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICMPX achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 3.65% return.

ICMPX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: -4.68%
• 6M: -5.13%
• 1Y: -2.40%
• 3Y*: 6.30%
• 5Y*: 1.16%
• 10Y*: —

GSIMX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -4.59%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 9.87%
• 3Y*: 15.56%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICMPX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ICMPX Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio	-4.68%	11.70%	5.62%	17.84%	-20.11%	10.02%	23.95%	32.86%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	3.65%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	15.77%	28.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ICMPX and GSIMX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between ICMPX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ICMPX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICMPX

ICMPX Risk / Return Rank: 2
ICMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ICMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ICMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ICMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ICMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 16
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICMPX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICMPX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	1.07	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	1.49	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.20	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	1.35	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.20	4.15	-4.35

ICMPX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMPX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICMPX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMPX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMPX and GSIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICMPX	GSIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.70%	-28.84%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.45%	-7.81%	-7.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.45%	-10.32%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.70%	-25.37%	-9.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.54%	-6.24%	-2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-4.81%	-3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	2.53%	+3.12%

Volatility

ICMPX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio (ICMPX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.83%. This indicates that ICMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICMPX	GSIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	2.83%	+1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	8.21%	+3.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.01%	9.89%	+4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.42%	14.37%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.62%	15.67%	+1.95%

ICMPX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICMPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICMPX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

ICMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than GSIMX's 4.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.94%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%
ICMPX Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio	4.56%	4.35%	2.92%	0.62%	1.07%	2.04%	0.87%	2.47%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICMPX and GSIMX in my portfolio?

ICMPX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICMPX or GSIMX?

ICMPX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to GSIMX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMPX dropped -34.70% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.