ICFSX vs. BTO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ICFSX (ICON Consumer Select Fund) and BTO (John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ICFSX returned 10.03%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for BTO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICFSX charges 1.32%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for BTO.

Performance

ICFSX vs. BTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) and John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICFSX achieves a -6.17% return, which is significantly lower than BTO's 6.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ICFSX having a 10.03% annualized return and BTO not far ahead at 10.20%.

ICFSX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: -6.17%
• 6M: -2.91%
• 1Y: 1.09%
• 3Y*: 14.71%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

BTO

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -1.08%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 10.84%
• 1Y: 16.23%
• 3Y*: 21.21%
• 5Y*: 4.58%
• 10Y*: 10.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICFSX vs. BTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICFSX ICON Consumer Select Fund	-6.17%	5.96%	35.19%	18.16%	-10.30%	22.79%	-7.47%	36.93%	-18.04%	20.03%
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund	6.75%	5.85%	28.92%	-1.16%	-23.58%	61.86%	-8.97%	38.87%	-25.68%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ICFSX and BTO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 1997	0.71

The correlation between ICFSX and BTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (5 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ICFSX vs. BTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICFSX

ICFSX Risk / Return Rank: 3
ICFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ICFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ICFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ICFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
ICFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BTO

BTO Risk / Return Rank: 9
BTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BTO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BTO Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICFSX vs. BTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) and John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICFSX	BTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	0.80	-0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.21	1.23	-1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.15	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	1.02	-0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	2.55	-2.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICFSX vs. BTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICFSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the BTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICFSX and BTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICFSX	BTO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08	0.80	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.15	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.28	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.30	-0.11

Drawdowns

ICFSX vs. BTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICFSX drawdown since its inception was -77.40%, which is greater than BTO's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICFSX and BTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICFSX	BTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.40%	-72.27%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.67%	-15.26%	+2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.61%	-25.19%	+4.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.27%	-51.80%	+28.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.50%	-65.70%	+17.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.21%	-5.74%	-3.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.36%	-19.00%	-2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	6.11%	-1.56%

Volatility

ICFSX vs. BTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICON Consumer Select Fund (ICFSX) is 3.77%, while John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that ICFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICFSX	BTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	4.75%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.49%	14.81%	-4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.19%	20.51%	-6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.44%	31.34%	-10.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.77%	36.13%	-12.36%

ICFSX vs. BTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICFSX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is lower than BTO's 2.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICFSX vs. BTO - Dividend Comparison

ICFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.99%, more than BTO's 7.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund	7.07%	7.41%	7.28%	8.64%	7.51%	4.72%	7.25%	6.06%	5.94%	3.76%	5.10%	4.75%
ICFSX ICON Consumer Select Fund	11.99%	11.25%	34.59%	7.32%	17.71%	10.98%	0.00%	1.94%	0.75%	0.21%	0.97%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICFSX and BTO in my portfolio?

ICFSX and BTO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICFSX or BTO?

BTO has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to ICFSX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICFSX dropped -77.40% vs BTO's -72.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.