ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L
ICDU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ESIC.L (iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from iShares - ICDU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index while ESIC.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICDU.L returned 9.32%/yr vs -1.55%/yr for ESIC.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICDU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIC.L.
Performance
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICDU.L is traded in GBp, while ESIC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICDU.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than ESIC.L's -11.67% return.
ICDU.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
ESIC.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- -11.67%
- 6M
- -11.51%
- 1Y
- -3.34%
- 3Y*
- -2.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICDU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.52% | -0.77% | 33.05% | 35.72% | -29.67% | 25.98% | 1.88% |
ESIC.L iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -11.67% | 7.11% | -1.15% | 12.93% | -11.01% | 14.25% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICDU.L and ESIC.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ICDU.L and ESIC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICDU.L
ESIC.L
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ICDU.L
ESIC.L
Communication Services
ICDU.L
ESIC.L
Technology
ICDU.L
ESIC.L
Industrials
ICDU.L
ESIC.L
Basic Materials
ICDU.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ICDU.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Energy
ICDU.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Financial Services
ICDU.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Healthcare
ICDU.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Real Estate
ICDU.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Utilities
ICDU.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICDU.L
ESIC.L
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICDU.L | ESIC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.99 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.15 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.61 | -0.35 | +2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICDU.L | ESIC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | -0.17 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | -0.07 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.11 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICDU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, which is greater than ESIC.L's maximum drawdown of -28.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICDU.L and ESIC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICDU.L | ESIC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.84% | -28.93% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -21.82% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.64% | -23.39% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.84% | -28.93% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -15.64% | +9.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -9.39% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 9.50% | -4.40% |
Volatility
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) is 5.13%, while iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that ICDU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICDU.L | ESIC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 6.36% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 15.17% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.68% | 19.03% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 20.84% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 20.37% | -0.22% |
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICDU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIC.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICDU.L vs. ESIC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICDU.L nor ESIC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICDU.L and ESIC.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICDU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICDU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIC.L.
ICDU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index, while ESIC.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICDU.L and 0.18% for ESIC.L.
Find the right allocation for ICDU.L and ESIC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer