PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTU.L vs. TREI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBTU.L having a 1.76% return and TREI.L slightly higher at 1.77%.


IBTU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
6M
1.76%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*

TREI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
6M
1.65%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.76%4.33%5.31%4.92%1.05%0.10%0.68%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
1.77%4.31%5.17%4.98%0.53%-0.02%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTU.L and TREI.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.14

The correlation between IBTU.L and TREI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

TREI.L
TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTU.LTREI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.84

4.71

-0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.33

13.21

+6.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

94.97

159.95

-64.97

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is lower than the TREI.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTU.L and TREI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTU.L drawdown since its inception was -0.72%, which is greater than TREI.L's maximum drawdown of -0.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTU.L and TREI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTU.LTREI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-0.68%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-0.29%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.20%

-0.29%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.40%

-0.67%

+0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.06%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.02%

+0.02%

Volatility

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) has a higher volatility of 0.28% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that IBTU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTU.LTREI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

0.10%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.77%

0.50%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11%

0.59%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.02%

0.55%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

0.56%

+0.39%

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTU.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TREI.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTU.L vs. TREI.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than TREI.L's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.05%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
3.92%4.23%4.98%4.59%1.51%0.10%0.69%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTU.L and TREI.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREI.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREI.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTU.L.

IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while TREI.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTU.L and 0.06% for TREI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTU.L and TREI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer