PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTU.L is traded in USD, while CUKX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CUKX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTU.L achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than CUKX.L's 5.60% return.


IBTU.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*

CUKX.L

1D
0.33%
1M
0.65%
YTD
5.60%
6M
8.84%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.39%4.36%5.23%4.96%1.09%-0.01%0.96%1.94%
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
5.60%35.27%7.48%13.40%-6.25%16.41%-8.56%10.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTU.L and CUKX.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CUKX.L
CUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTU.LCUKX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+15.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.95

1.28

+2.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.79

2.06

+22.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

183.92

7.07

+176.85

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio is 8.12, which is higher than the CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTU.L and CUKX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTU.LCUKX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.12

1.52

+6.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

6.79

0.64

+6.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.05

0.39

+4.67

Drawdowns

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTU.L drawdown since its inception was -0.62%, smaller than the maximum CUKX.L drawdown of -42.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTU.L and CUKX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTU.LCUKX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-42.20%

+41.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-9.84%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.16%

-13.17%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.29%

-26.11%

+25.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.56%

+4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-7.99%

+7.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

2.88%

-2.86%

Volatility

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) is 0.08%, while iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that IBTU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTU.LCUKX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

5.13%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.31%

11.28%

-10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49%

13.37%

-12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.50%

16.46%

-15.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.54%

18.33%

-17.79%

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBTU.L and CUKX.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTU.L vs. CUKX.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while CUKX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.07%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTU.L and CUKX.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTU.L and CUKX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while CUKX.L tracks FTSE 100 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTU.L and CUKX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer