IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L
IBTS.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF) and XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTS.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while XDJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBTS.L returned 2.52%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for XDJP.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBTS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDJP.L.
Performance
IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBTS.L is traded in GBP, while XDJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDJP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTS.L achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 31.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IBTS.L has underperformed XDJP.L with an annualized return of 2.52%, while XDJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.
IBTS.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
XDJP.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 29.24%
- 1Y
- 64.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTS.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 0.65% | -1.91% | 5.79% | -1.41% | 7.61% | 0.64% | -0.34% | 0.37% | 7.21% | -8.60% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 31.98% | 21.04% | 9.67% | 15.52% | -10.26% | -3.79% | 21.77% | 16.58% | -3.53% | 14.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTS.L and XDJP.L is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013 | 0.11 |
The correlation between IBTS.L and XDJP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBTS.L
XDJP.L
IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTS.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.48 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 4.77 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 14.50 | -11.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTS.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 2.85 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.71 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.78 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.75 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.02%, smaller than the maximum XDJP.L drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTS.L and XDJP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTS.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.02% | -23.69% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -13.40% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.89% | -18.82% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.28% | -20.61% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.02% | -23.69% | +4.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.51% | -1.35% | -6.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -6.79% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 4.42% | -2.64% |
Volatility
IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) is 1.67%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that IBTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTS.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 6.75% | -5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.49% | 17.68% | -13.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.09% | 22.44% | -16.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 17.72% | -9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 17.63% | -8.39% |
IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTS.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison
IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than XDJP.L's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTS.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 3.99% | 4.22% | 4.12% | 3.08% | 0.75% | 0.61% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 1.49% | 1.01% | 0.67% | 0.49% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.47% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTS.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDJP.L.
IBTS.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTS.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.
Find the right allocation for IBTS.L and XDJP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer