PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRE7.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTS.L is traded in GBP, while TRE7.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRE7.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTS.L achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than TRE7.L's 1.93% return.


IBTS.L

1D
0.32%
1M
2.39%
YTD
2.73%
6M
3.46%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*
2.09%

TRE7.L

1D
0.48%
1M
2.65%
YTD
1.93%
6M
2.48%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
2.73%-1.91%5.79%-1.41%7.61%0.64%-0.34%0.22%
TRE7.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist
1.93%-0.32%3.86%-0.97%1.41%-1.43%3.86%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTS.L and TRE7.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2019

0.75

The correlation between IBTS.L and TRE7.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTS.L
IBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TRE7.L
TRE7.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TRE7.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRE7.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRE7.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TRE7.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRE7.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRE7.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTS.LTRE7.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.08

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

2.82

+0.96

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the TRE7.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTS.L and TRE7.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, which is greater than TRE7.L's maximum drawdown of -20.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTS.L and TRE7.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTS.LTRE7.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.85%

-20.09%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-5.59%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.89%

-7.60%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.29%

-16.02%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.60%

-10.92%

+5.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.16%

-12.33%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

2.15%

-0.38%

Volatility

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) is 1.49%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRE7.L) has a volatility of 1.64%. This indicates that IBTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRE7.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTS.LTRE7.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.64%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

5.08%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.20%

6.36%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.09%

8.55%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.75%

8.88%

-0.13%

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TRE7.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTS.L vs. TRE7.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than TRE7.L's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
3.91%4.22%4.12%3.08%0.75%0.61%1.84%2.39%1.49%1.01%0.67%0.49%
TRE7.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.14%4.09%4.23%3.61%1.72%0.87%1.29%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTS.L and TRE7.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRE7.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRE7.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTS.L.

IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while TRE7.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTS.L and 0.06% for TRE7.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTS.L and TRE7.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer