PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTS.L vs. SHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTS.L vs. SHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTS.L is traded in GBP, while SHY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SHY values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTS.L achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than SHY's 0.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBTS.L having a 2.54% annualized return and SHY not far behind at 2.45%.


IBTS.L

1D
0.19%
1M
1.36%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.07%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
1.62%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
2.54%

SHY

1D
0.22%
1M
0.91%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.03%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
1.45%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTS.L vs. SHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.51%-1.91%5.79%-1.41%7.61%0.64%-0.34%0.37%7.21%-8.60%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.80%-2.53%5.73%-1.04%7.55%0.23%0.01%-0.55%7.48%-8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTS.L and SHY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.74

The correlation between IBTS.L and SHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTS.L vs. SHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTS.L
IBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SHY
SHY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTS.L vs. SHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTS.LSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.77

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

2.11

+0.18

IBTS.L vs. SHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the SHY Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTS.L and SHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTS.LSHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.65

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.35

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.26

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.42

-0.06

Drawdowns

IBTS.L vs. SHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.02%, roughly equal to the maximum SHY drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTS.L and SHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTS.LSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-18.95%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-5.24%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.89%

-9.28%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.28%

-16.58%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.02%

-18.62%

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-8.38%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-8.31%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.92%

-0.15%

Volatility

IBTS.L vs. SHY - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) at 1.56%. This indicates that IBTS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTS.LSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

1.56%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

4.78%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10%

6.23%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.09%

8.11%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.24%

9.30%

-0.06%

IBTS.L vs. SHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SHY's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTS.L vs. SHY - Dividend Comparison

IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than SHY's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
4.00%4.22%4.12%3.08%0.75%0.61%1.84%2.39%1.49%1.01%0.67%0.49%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.68%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTS.L and SHY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHY.

IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while SHY tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTS.L and 0.15% for SHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTS.L and SHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer