PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTS.L vs. MINV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTS.L is traded in GBP, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTS.L achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than MINV.L's 1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IBTS.L has underperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 2.25%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.80% annualized return.


IBTS.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.39%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
2.11%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
2.25%

MINV.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.74%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.65%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
7.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.78%-1.91%5.79%-1.41%7.61%0.64%-0.34%0.37%7.22%-8.60%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
1.59%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%-1.05%18.84%3.17%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTS.L and MINV.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.42

The correlation between IBTS.L and MINV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (5 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTS.L
IBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTS.LMINV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.08

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

0.58

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

1.55

+1.06

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTS.L and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -45.91%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTS.L and MINV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTS.LMINV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.91%

-39.64%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-6.31%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.89%

-20.10%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.29%

-20.10%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.02%

-20.38%

+1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-3.04%

-4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-8.67%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.38%

-0.59%

Volatility

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) is 1.63%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that IBTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTS.LMINV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

2.48%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

5.91%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

7.92%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.09%

16.97%

-8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.24%

15.39%

-6.15%

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBTS.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
3.99%4.22%4.12%3.08%0.75%0.61%1.84%2.39%1.49%1.01%0.67%0.49%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTS.L and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

IBTS.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while MINV.L is Global Equities. IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTS.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTS.L and MINV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer