PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTS.L is traded in GBP, while JEDI.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the JEDI.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTS.L achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than JEDI.DE's 75.52% return.


IBTS.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.39%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
2.11%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
2.25%

JEDI.DE

1D
1.39%
1M
5.63%
YTD
75.52%
6M
79.17%
1Y
193.87%
3Y*
65.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.78%-1.91%5.79%-1.41%0.63%
JEDI.DE
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF
75.52%81.10%45.51%6.38%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTS.L and JEDI.DE is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTS.L
IBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

JEDI.DE
JEDI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JEDI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTS.LJEDI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.58

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

9.24

-8.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

30.25

-27.63

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the JEDI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTS.L and JEDI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -45.91%, which is greater than JEDI.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTS.L and JEDI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTS.LJEDI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.91%

-27.95%

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-22.67%

+18.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.89%

-27.95%

+19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-13.95%

+6.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-7.53%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

6.94%

-5.15%

Volatility

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) is 1.63%, while VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) has a volatility of 18.17%. This indicates that IBTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEDI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTS.LJEDI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

18.17%

-16.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

33.75%

-29.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

43.39%

-37.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.09%

31.93%

-23.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.24%

31.93%

-22.69%

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JEDI.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBTS.L vs. JEDI.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while JEDI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
3.99%4.22%4.12%3.08%0.75%0.61%1.84%2.39%1.49%1.01%0.67%0.49%
JEDI.DE
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTS.L and JEDI.DE have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDI.DE.

IBTS.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while JEDI.DE is Industrials Equities. IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while JEDI.DE tracks MVIS Global Space Industry ESG. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTS.L and 0.55% for JEDI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTS.L and JEDI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer