IBTR vs. ZROZ
IBTR (iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF) and ZROZ (PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund) are both Government Bonds funds - IBTR tracks the ICE 2036 Maturity US Treasury Index while ZROZ tracks the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBTR charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZROZ.
Performance
IBTR vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBTR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZROZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 1.16%
- 3Y*
- -7.12%
- 5Y*
- -13.08%
- 10Y*
- -5.05%
IBTR vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBTR iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF | -0.16% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | -2.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTR and ZROZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTR vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank
IBTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZROZ
IBTR vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF (IBTR) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTR | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTR vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTR drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum ZROZ drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTR and ZROZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTR | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -62.93% | +60.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -60.42% | +59.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -24.25% | +23.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.57% | — |
Volatility
IBTR vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTR | ZROZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.42% | 15.67% | -10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 23.81% | -18.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 21.98% | -16.56% |
IBTR vs. ZROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ZROZ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTR vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison
IBTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than ZROZ's 5.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTR iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZROZ PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund | 5.31% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 1.68% | 2.22% | 2.06% | 2.53% | 3.00% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTR and ZROZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTR is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTR is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZROZ.
ZROZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 1.00% for IBTR.
IBTR tracks ICE 2036 Maturity US Treasury Index, while ZROZ tracks ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTR and 0.15% for ZROZ.
Find the right allocation for IBTR and ZROZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer