IBTR vs. SPTL
IBTR (iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF) and SPTL (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IBTR tracks the ICE 2036 Maturity US Treasury Index while SPTL tracks the Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBTR charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTL.
Performance
IBTR vs. SPTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBTR
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- -0.93%
- 5Y*
- -5.38%
- 10Y*
- -1.12%
IBTR vs. SPTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBTR iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF | -0.01% |
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTR and SPTL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTR vs. SPTL — Risk / Return Rank
IBTR
SPTL
IBTR vs. SPTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF (IBTR) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTR | SPTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.24 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
IBTR vs. SPTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTR drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum SPTL drawdown of -46.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTR and SPTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTR | SPTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -46.20% | +43.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -37.09% | +35.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -14.25% | +13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.72% | — |
Volatility
IBTR vs. SPTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTR | SPTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 8.82% | -3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 14.61% | -9.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 13.94% | -8.55% |
IBTR vs. SPTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTL's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTR vs. SPTL - Dividend Comparison
IBTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SPTL's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTR iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Treasury ETF | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.03% | 3.24% | 2.75% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IBTR and SPTL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPTL is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTL is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTR.
SPTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.67% for IBTR.
IBTR tracks ICE 2036 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SPTL tracks Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTR and 0.03% for SPTL.
Find the right allocation for IBTR and SPTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer