IBTQ vs. SCHO
IBTQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IBTQ tracks the ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury Index while SCHO tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBTQ returned 4.35% vs 3.35% for SCHO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBTQ charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.
Performance
IBTQ vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTQ achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than SCHO's 0.50% return.
IBTQ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.82%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
IBTQ vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBTQ iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF | -0.68% | 5.09% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.50% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTQ and SCHO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IBTQ and SCHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTQ vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank
IBTQ
SCHO
IBTQ vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTQ | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.49 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 3.91 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 16.82 | -13.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTQ | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.46 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.00 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IBTQ vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTQ drawdown since its inception was -4.27%, smaller than the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTQ and SCHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTQ | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -5.69% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -0.86% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -0.18% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -0.61% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 0.20% | +1.23% |
Volatility
IBTQ vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF (IBTQ) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.42%. This indicates that IBTQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTQ | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 0.42% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.47% | 0.91% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.02% | 1.37% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 1.98% | +3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 1.56% | +4.06% |
IBTQ vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTQ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTQ vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
IBTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than SCHO's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTQ iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF | 3.72% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.90% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTQ and SCHO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBTQ has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to SCHO (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTQ dropped -4.27% vs SCHO's -5.69%.
On 1-year performance, IBTQ leads with 4.35% vs 3.35% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBTQ has performed better with a 4.35% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTQ.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.72% for IBTQ.
IBTQ tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTQ and 0.03% for SCHO.
SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTQ and SCHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer