PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTL vs. XONE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTL vs. XONE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTL achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than XONE's 1.11% return.


IBTL

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
10Y*

XONE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.47%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTL vs. XONE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBTL
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF
-0.47%7.85%0.36%3.60%-1.96%
XONE
BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
1.11%4.41%4.83%4.74%0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTL and XONE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022

0.68

The correlation between IBTL and XONE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTL vs. XONE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTL
IBTL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IBTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTL Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XONE
XONE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XONE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XONE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTL vs. XONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTLXONEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-15.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

3.57

-2.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

24.16

-22.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

138.74

-134.84

IBTL vs. XONE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the XONE Sharpe Ratio of 7.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTL and XONE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTLXONEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

7.06

-6.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

4.96

-5.17

Drawdowns

IBTL vs. XONE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTL drawdown since its inception was -20.93%, which is greater than XONE's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL and XONE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTLXONEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.93%

-0.40%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-0.16%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.38%

-0.28%

-7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.25%

-0.02%

-7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-0.04%

-11.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.03%

+0.94%

Volatility

IBTL vs. XONE - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) at 0.10%. This indicates that IBTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTLXONEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

0.10%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

0.34%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

0.55%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.46%

0.86%

+6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.46%

0.86%

+6.60%

IBTL vs. XONE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XONE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTL vs. XONE - Dividend Comparison

IBTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than XONE's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IBTL
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF
3.97%3.93%4.07%3.04%2.36%0.70%
XONE
BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.06%4.33%5.21%4.46%1.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTL and XONE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBTL has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to XONE (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTL dropped -20.93% vs XONE's -0.40%.

On 3-year performance, XONE leads with 4.57% vs 2.83% for IBTL. On fees, XONE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XONE has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XONE has performed better with a 4.57% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XONE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTL.

XONE has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 3.97% for IBTL.

IBTL tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index, while XONE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Target Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTL and 0.03% for XONE.

XONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTL and XONE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer