IBTH vs. QPUX
IBTH (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF) and QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index, while QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. IBTH is passively managed, while QPUX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. IBTH charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for QPUX.
Performance
IBTH vs. QPUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTH achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than QPUX's -7.70% return.
IBTH
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
QPUX
- 1D
- -15.07%
- 1M
- 59.73%
- YTD
- -7.70%
- 6M
- -29.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTH vs. QPUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 0.92% | 1.83% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -7.70% | -15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTH and QPUX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTH vs. QPUX — Risk / Return Rank
IBTH
QPUX
IBTH vs. QPUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) and Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTH | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTH | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.14 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
IBTH vs. QPUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTH drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, smaller than the maximum QPUX drawdown of -94.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTH and QPUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTH | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -94.73% | +78.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -81.69% | +80.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -63.48% | +56.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | — | — |
Volatility
IBTH vs. QPUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTH | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11% | 194.76% | -193.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.20% | 194.76% | -190.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 194.76% | -190.55% |
IBTH vs. QPUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QPUX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTH vs. QPUX - Dividend Comparison
IBTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 3.83% | 3.92% | 4.04% | 3.61% | 2.00% | 0.77% | 0.50% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTH and QPUX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.
IBTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.
IBTH is categorized as Government Bonds, while QPUX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTH and 1.29% for QPUX.
Find the right allocation for IBTH and QPUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer