IBTH vs. IONL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IBTH (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF) and IONL (GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IONL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the IonQ Inc. (IONQ). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBTH returned 3.81% vs 17.09% for IONL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. IBTH charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for IONL.

Performance

IBTH vs. IONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) and GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTH achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than IONL's 62.37% return.

IBTH

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.94%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: 3.93%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: —

IONL

• 1D: 6.05%
• 1M: 114.51%
• YTD: 62.37%
• 6M: 37.00%
• 1Y: 17.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTH vs. IONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF	0.94%	3.75%
IONL GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF	62.37%	38.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTH and IONL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

IBTH vs. IONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTH

IBTH Risk / Return Rank: 96
IBTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IBTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IBTH Omega Ratio Rank: 97
IBTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IBTH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

IONL

IONL Risk / Return Rank: 17
IONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
IONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
IONL Omega Ratio Rank: 25
IONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
IONL Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTH vs. IONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) and GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBTH	IONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.44	0.09	+3.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.25	1.57	+4.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.88	1.17	+0.70
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.82	0.20	+9.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.04	0.30	+37.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBTH vs. IONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTH Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the IONL Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTH and IONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBTH	IONL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.44	0.09	+3.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.50	-0.36

Drawdowns

IBTH vs. IONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTH drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, smaller than the maximum IONL drawdown of -93.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTH and IONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBTH	IONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.16%	-93.41%	+77.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.38%	-93.41%	+93.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-61.99%	+60.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	-50.06%	+43.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.10%	61.89%	-61.79%

Volatility

IBTH vs. IONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) is 0.19%, while GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF (IONL) has a volatility of 58.33%. This indicates that IBTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBTH	IONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.19%	58.33%	-58.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.54%	130.77%	-130.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12%	181.43%	-180.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.20%	195.59%	-191.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.21%	195.59%	-191.38%

IBTH vs. IONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IONL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBTH vs. IONL - Dividend Comparison

IBTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while IONL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF	3.83%	3.92%	4.04%	3.61%	2.00%	0.77%	0.50%
IONL GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBTH and IONL in my portfolio?

IBTH and IONL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBTH or IONL?

IONL has higher volatility (58.33%) compared to IBTH (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTH dropped -16.16% vs IONL's -93.41%.

Which ETF is better, IBTH or IONL?

On 1-year performance, IONL leads with 17.09% vs 3.81% for IBTH. On fees, IBTH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTH has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBTH or IONL?

Over the 1-year period, IONL has performed better with a 17.09% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBTH or IONL?

IBTH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for IONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBTH or IONL?

IBTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.00% for IONL.

What is the main difference between IBTH and IONL?

IBTH is categorized as Government Bonds, while IONL is Leveraged Equities. IBTH tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IONL tracks IonQ Inc. (IONQ). They also come from different issuers: iShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTH and 1.50% for IONL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.