IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L
IBTE.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and CNYB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTE.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc), while CNYB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBTE.L returned 0.06%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for CNYB.L. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IBTE.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNYB.L.
Performance
IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBTE.L is traded in EUR, while CNYB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CNYB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTE.L achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than CNYB.L's 7.98% return.
IBTE.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 1.46%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTE.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -0.14% | 3.04% | 2.49% | 1.87% | -5.75% | -1.46% | 1.84% | -0.18% |
CNYB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 7.98% | -7.30% | 11.79% | -2.06% | 0.74% | 16.82% | -24.15% | 6.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTE.L and CNYB.L is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019 | -0.08 |
The correlation between IBTE.L and CNYB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBTE.L
CNYB.L
IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBTE.L) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CNYB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTE.L | CNYB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 3.32 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 8.86 | -5.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTE.L drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum CNYB.L drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTE.L and CNYB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTE.L | CNYB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -27.64% | +19.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.98% | -2.80% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.03% | -11.45% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.66% | -13.36% | +5.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -5.55% | +4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -12.51% | +9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 1.05% | -0.66% |
Volatility
IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBTE.L) is 0.50%, while iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CNYB.L) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that IBTE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTE.L | CNYB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | 1.33% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.37% | 4.21% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 5.97% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.28% | 7.22% | -4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.97% | 11.88% | -9.91% |
IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTE.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTE.L vs. CNYB.L - Dividend Comparison
IBTE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.72% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 2.55% | 2.72% | 2.74% | 2.65% | 0.72% |
IBTE.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTE.L and CNYB.L have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTE.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTE.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CNYB.L.
IBTE.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CNYB.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. IBTE.L tracks iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc), while CNYB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBTE.L and 0.35% for CNYB.L.
Find the right allocation for IBTE.L and CNYB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer