PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBTE.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTE.L is traded in EUR, while BBIL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BBIL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTE.L achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than BBIL.L's 4.58% return.


IBTE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
-0.20%
1Y
1.20%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*

BBIL.L

1D
0.02%
1M
0.80%
6M
3.13%
YTD
4.58%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBTE.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.20%3.04%2.49%1.87%-5.75%-1.46%1.84%-0.14%
BBIL.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc
4.58%-8.07%12.10%1.76%7.34%7.45%-7.55%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTE.L and BBIL.L is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2019

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTE.L
IBTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IBTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

BBIL.L
BBIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BBIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBTE.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTE.LBBIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.36

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.01

3.47

-0.45

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the BBIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTE.L and BBIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTE.L drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum BBIL.L drawdown of -13.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTE.L and BBIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTE.LBBIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-13.51%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.98%

-3.82%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-11.54%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.66%

-11.80%

+4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-5.07%

+4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-6.18%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

1.50%

-1.10%

Volatility

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IBTE.L) is 0.45%, while JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that IBTE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTE.LBBIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

1.17%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

4.45%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74%

6.15%

-4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

7.59%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.97%

7.41%

-5.44%

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBTE.L and BBIL.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTE.L vs. BBIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBTE.L nor BBIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTE.L and BBIL.L have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTE.L and BBIL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBTE.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while BBIL.L tracks ICE BofA 0-1Y US Treasury TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and J.P. Morgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTE.L and BBIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer