PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTA.L vs. TREI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTA.L achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than TREI.L's 1.77% return.


IBTA.L

1D
0.17%
1M
0.17%
6M
0.85%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*

TREI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
6M
1.65%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.68%5.34%4.07%4.21%-3.75%-0.64%3.05%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
1.77%4.31%5.17%4.98%0.53%-0.02%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTA.L and TREI.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between IBTA.L and TREI.L has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTA.L
IBTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TREI.L
TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTA.LTREI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

4.71

-3.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

13.21

-8.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.96

159.95

-141.99

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the TREI.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTA.L and TREI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTA.L drawdown since its inception was -5.80%, which is greater than TREI.L's maximum drawdown of -0.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTA.L and TREI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTA.LTREI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-0.68%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.67%

-0.29%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.89%

-0.29%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.70%

-0.67%

-5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-0.06%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

0.02%

+0.17%

Volatility

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that IBTA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTA.LTREI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

0.10%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.16%

0.50%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57%

0.59%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.18%

0.55%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.93%

0.56%

+1.37%

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TREI.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTA.L vs. TREI.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TREI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
3.92%4.23%4.98%4.59%1.51%0.10%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTA.L and TREI.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREI.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREI.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTA.L.

IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while TREI.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTA.L and 0.06% for TREI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTA.L and TREI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer