IBTA.L vs. CRWD
IBTA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, IBTA.L returned 1.89%/yr vs 24.23%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBTA.L vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTA.L achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 47.82% return.
IBTA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CRWD
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 16.64%
- YTD
- 47.82%
- 6M
- 42.14%
- 1Y
- 44.17%
- 3Y*
- 64.68%
- 5Y*
- 24.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTA.L vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.51% | 5.34% | 4.07% | 4.21% | -3.75% | -0.64% | 3.14% | 1.52% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 47.82% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTA.L and CRWD is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.01 |
The correlation between IBTA.L and CRWD shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTA.L vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
IBTA.L
CRWD
IBTA.L vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTA.L | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.19 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.15 | 1.19 | +3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.76 | 2.72 | +15.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTA.L vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTA.L drawdown since its inception was -5.80%, smaller than the maximum CRWD drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTA.L and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTA.L | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -67.69% | +61.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.67% | -37.18% | +36.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.89% | -44.44% | +43.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.70% | -67.69% | +61.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.41% | +11.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -23.61% | +22.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 16.31% | -16.11% |
Volatility
IBTA.L vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) is 0.52%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 18.35%. This indicates that IBTA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTA.L | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 18.35% | -17.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.13% | 37.68% | -36.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58% | 45.58% | -44.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 50.79% | -48.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.93% | 56.06% | -54.13% |
Dividends
IBTA.L vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBTA.L nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTA.L and CRWD have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IBTA.L and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer