IBOT vs. TSXU
IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - IBOT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar® Robotics Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBOT charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
IBOT vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBOT achieves a 27.73% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
IBOT
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 27.73%
- 6M
- 28.82%
- 1Y
- 57.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBOT vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 27.73% | 4.92% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBOT and TSXU is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBOT vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
IBOT
TSXU
IBOT vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 4.53 | -3.34 |
Drawdowns
IBOT vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBOT drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOT and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.39% | -35.62% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.92% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -10.56% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | — | — |
Volatility
IBOT vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 78.68% | -56.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 78.68% | -56.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 78.68% | -56.59% |
IBOT vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBOT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBOT vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 0.30% | 0.38% | 2.81% | 2.06% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBOT and TSXU have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBOT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBOT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.30% for IBOT.
IBOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. IBOT tracks BlueStar® Robotics Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBOT and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for IBOT and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer