IBOT vs. FBOT

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) and FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IBOT is passively managed, while FBOT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBOT returned 19.96%/yr vs 14.45%/yr for FBOT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBOT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FBOT.

Performance

IBOT vs. FBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBOT achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly higher than FBOT's 13.86% return.

IBOT

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: 16.58%
• YTD: 23.40%
• 1Y: 40.31%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBOT

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -1.23%
• 6M: 7.34%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 1Y: 25.82%
• 3Y*: 14.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBOT vs. FBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	23.40%	28.57%	6.39%	6.75%
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	13.86%	19.15%	12.58%	-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IBOT and FBOT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2023	0.91

The correlation between IBOT and FBOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IBOT vs. FBOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBOT	FBOT
Technology	50.6%	37.5%
Industrials	44.1%	52.4%
Energy	2.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.2%	4.3%
Healthcare	0.8%	0.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IBOT vs. FBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBOT

IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 62
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FBOT

FBOT Risk / Return Rank: 42
FBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBOT vs. FBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBOT	FBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.19	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	1.69	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	1.71	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	6.40	+3.06

IBOT vs. FBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the FBOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBOT and FBOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBOT vs. FBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBOT drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, which is greater than FBOT's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOT and FBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBOT	FBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.39%	-23.61%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.74%	-15.17%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	-23.61%	-1.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-5.55%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-5.10%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.28%	4.05%	+0.23%

Volatility

IBOT vs. FBOT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) at 7.64%. This indicates that IBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBOT	FBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	7.64%	+2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.69%	18.04%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.54%	21.85%	+2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.75%	21.29%	+1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.75%	21.29%	+1.46%

IBOT vs. FBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBOT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FBOT's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBOT vs. FBOT - Dividend Comparison

IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than FBOT's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	0.44%	0.81%	0.31%	0.20%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	0.31%	0.38%	2.81%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBOT and FBOT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IBOT and FBOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IBOT or FBOT?

IBOT has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to FBOT (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBOT dropped -25.39% vs FBOT's -23.61%.

Which ETF is better, IBOT or FBOT?

On 3-year performance, IBOT leads with 19.96% vs 14.45% for FBOT. On fees, IBOT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FBOT has been the lower-risk option at 7.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBOT or FBOT?

Over the 3-year period, IBOT has performed better with a 19.96% return vs 14.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBOT or FBOT?

IBOT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FBOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBOT or FBOT?

FBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.31% for IBOT.

What is the main difference between IBOT and FBOT?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBOT and 0.50% for FBOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.