IBMT vs. TAXS
IBMT (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF) and TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - IBMT tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2031 Index while TAXS tracks the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBMT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXS.
Performance
IBMT vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMT achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than TAXS's 0.93% return.
IBMT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 6.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMT vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMT iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.19% | 2.47% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.93% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMT and TAXS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMT vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank
IBMT
TAXS
IBMT vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBMT | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMT | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 2.78 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
IBMT vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMT and TAXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMT | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -0.84% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -0.09% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -0.24% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMT vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMT | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11% | 1.00% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 1.00% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 1.00% | +2.86% |
IBMT vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBMT vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison
IBMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than TAXS's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IBMT iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF | 3.65% | 2.98% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.83% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMT and TAXS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMT.
IBMT has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.83% for TAXS.
IBMT tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2031 Index, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMT and 0.05% for TAXS.
Find the right allocation for IBMT and TAXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer