IBMT vs. HYMB
IBMT (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF) and HYMB (State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - IBMT tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2031 Index while HYMB tracks the ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBMT returned 3.08% vs 6.50% for HYMB. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IBMT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYMB.
Performance
IBMT vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 2.11% return.
IBMT
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.63%
HYMB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.30M | $37.83M | $29.23M | |
| $1.12M | $1.36M | $1.09M |
IBMT vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMT iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.37% | 7.26% |
HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 2.11% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMT and HYMB is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between IBMT and HYMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMT vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank
IBMT
HYMB
IBMT vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT) and State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMT | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.32 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 9.52 | -6.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMT vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMT and HYMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMT | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -29.57% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -3.11% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -1.89% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -3.77% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 0.76% | +0.36% |
Volatility
IBMT vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT) is 0.65%, while State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that IBMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMT | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 1.16% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 3.25% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05% | 4.05% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.84% | 6.68% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.84% | 11.36% | -7.52% |
IBMT vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMT vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison
IBMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than HYMB's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.55% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.95% | 4.03% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 4.54% |
IBMT iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF | 3.25% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMT and HYMB have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMB has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to IBMT (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMT dropped -3.18% vs HYMB's -29.57%.
On 1-year performance, HYMB leads with 6.50% vs 3.08% for IBMT. On fees, IBMT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMT has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYMB has performed better with a 6.50% return vs 3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.
HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.25% for IBMT.
IBMT tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2031 Index, while HYMB tracks ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMT and 0.35% for HYMB.
HYMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBMT and HYMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer