PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMS vs. TAXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBMS vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMS) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMS achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than TAXS's 0.93% return.


IBMS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.87%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXS

1D
0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMS vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBMS and TAXS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBMS vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMS
IBMS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IBMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMS vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMS) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBMSTAXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

IBMS vs. TAXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBMSTAXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

2.78

-1.36

Drawdowns

IBMS vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMS drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMS and TAXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMSTAXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-0.84%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.09%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-0.24%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

Volatility

IBMS vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMSTAXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03%

1.00%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.07%

1.00%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.07%

1.00%

+2.07%

IBMS vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBMS vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison

IBMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than TAXS's 1.83% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IBMS and TAXS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMS.

IBMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.83% for TAXS.

IBMS tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2030 Index, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMS and 0.05% for TAXS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBMS and TAXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer