IBMS vs. TAXS
IBMS (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF) and TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - IBMS tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2030 Index while TAXS tracks the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBMS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXS.
Performance
IBMS vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMS achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than TAXS's 0.93% return.
IBMS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMS vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMS iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.35% | 1.76% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.93% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMS and TAXS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMS vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank
IBMS
TAXS
IBMS vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMS) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBMS | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMS | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 2.78 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
IBMS vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMS drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMS and TAXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMS | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -0.84% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.09% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -0.24% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMS vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMS | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 1.00% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 1.00% | +2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 1.00% | +2.07% |
IBMS vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBMS vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison
IBMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than TAXS's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IBMS iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.52% | 2.49% | 1.38% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.83% | 0.74% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMS and TAXS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMS.
IBMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.83% for TAXS.
IBMS tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2030 Index, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMS and 0.05% for TAXS.
Find the right allocation for IBMS and TAXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer