PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIH vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIH vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.54% return.


IBIH

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.29%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TIP

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.06%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
2.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIH vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
1.68%8.47%1.73%4.60%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.54%6.77%1.65%3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIH and TIP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.95

The correlation between IBIH and TIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIH vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIH vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIHTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.52

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

7.57

+3.34

IBIH vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIH Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIH and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIHTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.46

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.57

+0.68

Drawdowns

IBIH vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum TIP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIHTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-14.57%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-1.98%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.32%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-3.43%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.66%

-0.16%

Volatility

IBIH vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) have volatilities of 0.85% and 0.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIHTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.89%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

2.29%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

3.41%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

6.21%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

5.74%

-0.81%

IBIH vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIH vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than TIP's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
3.90%4.68%4.34%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.76%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IBIH and TIP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TIP has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to IBIH (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIH dropped -3.94% vs TIP's -14.57%.

On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 5.49% vs 4.96% for TIP. On fees, IBIH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for TIP.

IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.76% for TIP.

IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIH and 0.18% for TIP.

IBIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIH and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer