IBIF vs. HYGH
IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) and HYGH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while HYGH is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. IBIF is passively managed, while HYGH is actively managed. Over the past year, IBIF returned 4.65% vs 7.56% for HYGH. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. IBIF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for HYGH.
Performance
IBIF vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIF achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 2.76% return.
IBIF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYGH
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
IBIF vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 1.54% | 7.27% | 3.11% | 3.95% |
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 2.76% | 6.94% | 11.22% | 4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIF and HYGH is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | -0.02 |
The correlation between IBIF and HYGH shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIF vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank
IBIF
HYGH
IBIF vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIF | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.39 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.92 | 4.69 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.50 | 18.31 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIF | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.08 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | 0.56 | +1.12 |
Drawdowns
IBIF vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIF drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIF and HYGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIF | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -23.88% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -1.62% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.31% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -2.23% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.41% | -0.13% |
Volatility
IBIF vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) is 0.52%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) has a volatility of 0.62%. This indicates that IBIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIF | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 0.62% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 2.84% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04% | 3.66% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.55% | 7.07% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.55% | 8.35% | -4.80% |
IBIF vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGH's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIF vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison
IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than HYGH's 6.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 6.63% | 6.86% | 7.85% | 8.95% | 6.21% | 3.74% | 4.06% | 4.89% | 6.45% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.75% |
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 3.75% | 4.51% | 4.05% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIF and HYGH have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYGH has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to IBIF (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIF dropped -2.50% vs HYGH's -23.88%.
On 1-year performance, HYGH leads with 7.56% vs 4.65% for IBIF. On fees, IBIF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIF has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 7.56% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HYGH.
HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 3.75% for IBIF.
IBIF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while HYGH is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIF and 0.53% for HYGH.
IBIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIF and HYGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer