IBIF vs. ASTX
IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) and ASTX (Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while ASTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. IBIF is passively managed, while ASTX is actively managed. Over the past year, IBIF returned 3.41% vs -31.45% for ASTX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. IBIF charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ASTX.
Performance
IBIF vs. ASTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIF achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than ASTX's -54.99% return.
IBIF
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASTX
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -28.35%
- 6M
- -73.47%
- YTD
- -54.99%
- 1Y
- -31.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIF vs. ASTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 1.52% | 1.94% |
ASTX Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF | -54.99% | 63.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIF and ASTX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIF vs. ASTX — Risk / Return Rank
IBIF
ASTX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIF vs. ASTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIF | ASTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIF vs. ASTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIF drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum ASTX drawdown of -84.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIF and ASTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIF | ASTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -84.47% | +81.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -84.47% | +83.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -81.79% | +81.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -47.19% | +46.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIF vs. ASTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIF | ASTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07% | 215.43% | -213.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 215.43% | -211.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 215.43% | -211.92% |
IBIF vs. ASTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ASTX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIF vs. ASTX - Dividend Comparison
IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, while ASTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTX Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 4.94% | 4.51% | 4.05% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIF and ASTX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IBIF leads with 3.41% vs -31.45% for ASTX. On fees, IBIF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIF has performed better with a 3.41% return vs -31.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ASTX.
IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 0.00% for ASTX.
IBIF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while ASTX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIF and 1.30% for ASTX.
Find the right allocation for IBIF and ASTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer