PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHL vs. SCYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBHL vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBHL vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHL achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's -0.47% return.


IBHL

1D
1.09%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
0.91%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCYB

1D
0.89%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
0.62%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBHL vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBHL vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHL
IBHL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IBHL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SCYB
SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHL vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBHLSCYBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.19

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.75

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.60

+0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.10

8.44

+0.66

IBHL vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHL Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHL and SCYB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBHLSCYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.19

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

1.62

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between IBHL and SCYB is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IBHL vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

IBHL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than SCYB's 7.01% yield.


TTM202520242023
IBHL
iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.00%4.90%0.00%0.00%
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
7.01%6.99%7.06%3.36%

Drawdowns

IBHL vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHL drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum SCYB drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHL and SCYB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHLSCYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-4.92%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-4.22%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.50%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-0.53%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.80%

+0.05%

Volatility

IBHL vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 2.25%. This indicates that IBHL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBHLSCYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

2.25%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

2.91%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

5.67%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.56%

5.20%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.56%

5.20%

+0.36%