PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHL vs. BSJQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHL vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IBHL having a 1.08% return and BSJQ slightly lower at 1.04%.


IBHL

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.34%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSJQ

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.19%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
7.08%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHL vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBHL and BSJQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.72

The correlation between IBHL and BSJQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHL vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHL
IBHL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IBHL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHL Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJQ
BSJQ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BSJQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHL vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBHLBSJQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.69

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

7.77

-5.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

31.58

-22.23

IBHL vs. BSJQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHL Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the BSJQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHL and BSJQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBHL vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHL drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum BSJQ drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHL and BSJQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHLBSJQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-24.13%

+20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-0.54%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.25%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-2.16%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.13%

+0.56%

Volatility

IBHL vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 0.61%. This indicates that IBHL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHLBSJQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

0.61%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

1.01%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

1.36%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.37%

5.73%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

8.42%

-3.05%

IBHL vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHL vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison

IBHL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than BSJQ's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
5.79%6.10%6.58%6.58%5.58%4.27%4.64%4.59%2.39%
IBHL
iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.28%4.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHL and BSJQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBHL has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to BSJQ (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHL dropped -3.70% vs BSJQ's -24.13%.

On 1-year performance, IBHL leads with 6.44% vs 4.19% for BSJQ. On fees, IBHL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBHL has performed better with a 6.44% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJQ.

IBHL has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 5.79% for BSJQ.

IBHL tracks Bloomberg 2032 Term High Yield and Income Index, while BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHL and 0.42% for BSJQ.

BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHL and BSJQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer