IBHG vs. NHYB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while NHYB tracks the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NHYB.

Performance

IBHG vs. NHYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHG achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than NHYB's 1.96% return.

IBHG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.43%
• 1Y: 4.55%
• 3Y*: 7.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NHYB

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHG vs. NHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.17%	1.25%
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.96%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHG and NHYB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.67

Return for Risk

IBHG vs. NHYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHG

IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 82
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

NHYB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHG vs. NHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBHG	NHYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.89	—	—

Drawdowns

IBHG vs. NHYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHG drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, which is greater than NHYB's maximum drawdown of -2.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHG and NHYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHG	NHYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.85%	-2.40%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.15%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.64%	-0.36%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBHG	NHYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09%	3.65%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.33%	3.65%	+2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.33%	3.65%	+2.68%

IBHG vs. NHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYB's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBHG vs. NHYB - Dividend Comparison

IBHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than NHYB's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.07%	6.33%	7.02%	6.66%	5.62%	2.13%
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	4.24%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHG and NHYB in my portfolio?

IBHG and NHYB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBHG or NHYB?

On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHG or NHYB?

NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHG or NHYB?

IBHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.07%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.

What is the main difference between IBHG and NHYB?

IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHG and 0.08% for NHYB.