PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHG vs. HYZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHG vs. HYZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHG achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than HYZD's 3.50% return.


IBHG

1D
0.05%
1M
0.11%
6M
1.56%
YTD
1.53%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
7.07%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.55%

HYZD

1D
0.15%
1M
0.51%
6M
2.66%
YTD
3.50%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
5.36%
ALL TIME*
4.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.53M$1.90M$1.53M
$2.53M$2.72M$3.55M

IBHG vs. HYZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.53%6.90%7.42%11.27%-8.88%0.93%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
3.50%7.67%9.39%11.17%-2.35%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHG and HYZD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between IBHG and HYZD has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHG vs. HYZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBHG
IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HYZD
HYZD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HYZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYZD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HYZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYZD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBHG vs. HYZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBHGHYZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.48

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

3.66

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.62

15.97

+3.65

IBHG vs. HYZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the HYZD Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHG and HYZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBHG vs. HYZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHG drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, smaller than the maximum HYZD drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHG and HYZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHGHYZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-25.66%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.73%

-1.91%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.39%

-5.85%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.85%

-8.97%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-2.18%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.44%

-0.24%

Volatility

IBHG vs. HYZD - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) have volatilities of 0.46% and 0.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHGHYZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.44%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

2.39%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99%

3.01%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

6.69%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.27%

8.50%

-2.23%

IBHG vs. HYZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYZD's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHG vs. HYZD - Dividend Comparison

IBHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than HYZD's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
5.89%6.05%6.08%5.94%5.14%4.02%5.13%5.50%5.58%4.94%5.07%4.38%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
5.49%6.33%7.02%6.66%5.62%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHG and HYZD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBHG has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to HYZD (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHG dropped -13.85% vs HYZD's -25.66%.

On 5-year performance, HYZD leads with 6.27% vs 3.67% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYZD has performed better with a 6.27% return vs 3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HYZD.

HYZD has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 5.49% for IBHG.

IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HYZD tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond, Zero Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHG and 0.43% for HYZD.

HYZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHG and HYZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer