PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHG vs. HYGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHG vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHG achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 2.94% return.


IBHG

1D
0.14%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.57%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
10Y*

HYGH

1D
0.10%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.59%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHG vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.10%6.90%7.42%11.27%-8.88%1.07%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
2.94%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHG and HYGH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021

0.68

The correlation between IBHG and HYGH shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHG vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHG
IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHG vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBHGHYGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.51

4.82

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.87

18.86

+5.02

IBHG vs. HYGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the HYGH Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHG and HYGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBHGHYGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.14

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.56

+0.01

Drawdowns

IBHG vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHG drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHG and HYGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHGHYGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-23.88%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.73%

-1.62%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.39%

-8.06%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.13%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-2.23%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.41%

-0.21%

Volatility

IBHG vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) have volatilities of 0.59% and 0.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHGHYGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

0.61%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

2.84%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11%

3.65%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

7.07%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.36%

8.35%

-1.99%

IBHG vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGH's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHG vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison

IBHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, less than HYGH's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.62%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.07%6.33%7.02%6.66%5.62%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHG and HYGH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYGH has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to IBHG (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHG dropped -13.85% vs HYGH's -23.88%.

On 3-year performance, HYGH leads with 9.83% vs 7.53% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HYGH.

HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 6.07% for IBHG.

Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHG and 0.53% for HYGH.

IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHG and HYGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer