IBHG vs. DUKH
IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and DUKH (Ocean Park High Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. IBHG is passively managed, while DUKH is actively managed. Over the past year, IBHG returned 4.55% vs 5.16% for DUKH. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHG charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for DUKH.
Performance
IBHG vs. DUKH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHG achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than DUKH's 0.46% return.
IBHG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUKH
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHG vs. DUKH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.17% | 6.90% | 4.24% |
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF | 0.46% | 2.85% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHG and DUKH is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IBHG and DUKH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHG vs. DUKH — Risk / Return Rank
IBHG
DUKH
IBHG vs. DUKH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHG | DUKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 1.69 | +4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.89 | 5.81 | +17.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHG vs. DUKH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHG drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, which is greater than DUKH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHG and DUKH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHG | DUKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.85% | -5.70% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.73% | -3.06% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.81% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -1.12% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 0.89% | -0.69% |
Volatility
IBHG vs. DUKH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) is 0.44%, while Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that IBHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUKH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHG | DUKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 1.09% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.52% | 2.88% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09% | 3.52% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 3.79% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 3.79% | +2.54% |
IBHG vs. DUKH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DUKH's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHG vs. DUKH - Dividend Comparison
IBHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than DUKH's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF | 5.64% | 6.12% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.07% | 6.33% | 7.02% | 6.66% | 5.62% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHG and DUKH have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUKH has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to IBHG (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHG dropped -13.85% vs DUKH's -5.70%.
On 1-year performance, DUKH leads with 5.16% vs 4.55% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DUKH has performed better with a 5.16% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUKH.
IBHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.07%, compared with 5.64% for DUKH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHG and 1.07% for DUKH.
IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHG and DUKH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer