IBHF vs. QCON
IBHF (iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. IBHF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
IBHF vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHF
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHF vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | -0.01% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
IBHF vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBHF
QCON
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IBHF
QCON
-
Basic Materials
IBHF
-
QCON
-
Communication Services
IBHF
-
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBHF
-
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
IBHF
-
QCON
-
Financial Services
IBHF
-
QCON
Healthcare
IBHF
-
QCON
-
Industrials
IBHF
-
QCON
Real Estate
IBHF
-
QCON
-
Technology
IBHF
-
QCON
-
Utilities
IBHF
-
QCON
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHF vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
IBHF
QCON
IBHF vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBHF | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHF | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IBHF vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHF drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHF and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHF | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | 0.00% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | 0.00% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | — | — |
Volatility
IBHF vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHF | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 0.00% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 0.00% | +5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.66% | 0.00% | +5.66% |
IBHF vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHF vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
IBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.54% | 6.73% | 7.17% | 7.33% | 6.01% | 4.55% | 0.61% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QCON is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCON is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHF.
IBHF has the higher dividend yield at 6.54%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHF and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for IBHF and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer