IBHF vs. PSR
IBHF (iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and PSR (Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHF is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while PSR is a REIT fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBHF returned 4.03%/yr vs 2.51%/yr for PSR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
IBHF vs. PSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHF achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than PSR's 13.71% return.
IBHF
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
PSR
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
IBHF vs. PSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 0.32% | 6.60% | 8.55% | 10.40% | -6.66% | 4.43% | 2.97% |
PSR Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund | 13.71% | 2.63% | 1.79% | 8.34% | -25.52% | 41.71% | 2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHF and PSR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBHF and PSR has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IBHF vs. PSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBHF
PSR
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
IBHF
PSR
-
Basic Materials
IBHF
-
PSR
Communication Services
IBHF
-
PSR
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBHF
-
PSR
-
Consumer Defensive
IBHF
-
PSR
-
Financial Services
IBHF
-
PSR
Healthcare
IBHF
-
PSR
-
Industrials
IBHF
-
PSR
-
Real Estate
IBHF
-
PSR
Technology
IBHF
-
PSR
-
Utilities
IBHF
-
PSR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHF vs. PSR — Risk / Return Rank
IBHF
PSR
IBHF vs. PSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) and Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund (PSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBHF | PSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.19 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.76 | 1.68 | +5.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.83 | 5.27 | +16.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHF | PSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.06 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.14 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.51 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
IBHF vs. PSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHF drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum PSR drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHF and PSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHF | PSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -42.31% | +31.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.67% | -8.33% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.53% | -16.58% | +14.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.19% | -34.81% | +23.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -4.15% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -9.33% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 2.65% | -2.44% |
Volatility
IBHF vs. PSR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) is 0.72%, while Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund (PSR) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that IBHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHF | PSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 4.29% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.20% | 9.68% | -8.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 13.21% | -11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 18.54% | -12.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.66% | 20.31% | -14.65% |
IBHF vs. PSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBHF and PSR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
IBHF vs. PSR - Dividend Comparison
IBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than PSR's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.55% | 6.73% | 7.17% | 7.33% | 6.01% | 4.55% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSR Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund | 2.38% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 2.93% | 2.95% | 2.12% | 3.09% | 2.55% | 2.64% | 0.14% | 3.60% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHF and PSR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSR has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to IBHF (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHF dropped -11.19% vs PSR's -42.31%.
On 5-year performance, IBHF leads with 4.03% vs 2.51% for PSR. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, IBHF has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBHF has performed better with a 4.03% return vs 2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHF and PSR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
IBHF has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 2.38% for PSR.
IBHF is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PSR is REIT. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
IBHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHF and PSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer