PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBGS.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBGS.L is traded in GBP, while XGLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGS.L achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than XGLE.L's -0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IBGS.L has outperformed XGLE.L with an annualized return of 0.74%, while XGLE.L has yielded a comparatively lower -0.04% annualized return.


IBGS.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
-0.70%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
0.74%

XGLE.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.39%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
0.12%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
-1.98%
10Y*
-0.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBGS.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.90%7.76%-1.67%1.49%1.00%-7.24%5.38%-4.81%0.64%3.54%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.03%5.95%-2.94%4.66%-14.01%-9.34%10.68%0.57%1.78%4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGS.L and XGLE.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2009

0.71

The correlation between IBGS.L and XGLE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (5 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGS.L
IBGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IBGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XGLE.L
XGLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBGS.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBGS.LXGLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.07

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.49

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

1.02

+0.74

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGS.L and XGLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than XGLE.L's maximum drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGS.L and XGLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGS.LXGLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.26%

-26.78%

-72.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-4.53%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.05%

-6.20%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.95%

-20.99%

+15.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.11%

-26.78%

+13.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.93%

-18.37%

-80.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-9.40%

-85.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.17%

-0.92%

Volatility

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBGS.L) is 0.84%, while Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that IBGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGS.LXGLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

1.48%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

4.34%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

5.53%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.33%

7.49%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.78%

8.18%

-1.40%

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBGS.L and XGLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGS.L vs. XGLE.L - Dividend Comparison

IBGS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while XGLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBGS.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.18%2.39%2.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.28%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGS.L and XGLE.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBGS.L and XGLE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

IBGS.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGS.L and XGLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer