IBGS.L vs. CE31.L
IBGS.L (iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist)) and CE31.L (iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both European Government Bonds funds from iShares tracking the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBGS.L returned 1.38%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for CE31.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
IBGS.L vs. CE31.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBGS.L is traded in GBP, while CE31.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CE31.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBGS.L achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than CE31.L's -0.87% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: IBGS.L at 1.38% and CE31.L at 1.38%.
IBGS.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
CE31.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
IBGS.L vs. CE31.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGS.L iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | -1.02% | 7.76% | -1.67% | 1.50% | 1.00% | -7.25% | 5.39% | -4.81% | 0.64% | 3.54% |
CE31.L iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.87% | 7.55% | -1.61% | 1.46% | 1.17% | -7.40% | 5.40% | -4.80% | 0.64% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGS.L and CE31.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2013 | 0.98 |
The correlation between IBGS.L and CE31.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGS.L vs. CE31.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBGS.L
CE31.L
IBGS.L vs. CE31.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBGS.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBGS.L | CE31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.05 | 3.04 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBGS.L | CE31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.08 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
IBGS.L vs. CE31.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum CE31.L drawdown of -18.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGS.L and CE31.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGS.L | CE31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -18.33% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -2.62% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.06% | -3.05% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.95% | -5.98% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.11% | -13.14% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.95% | -3.95% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -7.25% | +1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.17% | -0.01% |
Volatility
IBGS.L vs. CE31.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBGS.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGS.L | CE31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.26% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 2.88% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 4.18% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 5.29% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.09% | 7.07% | +0.02% |
IBGS.L vs. CE31.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBGS.L and CE31.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBGS.L vs. CE31.L - Dividend Comparison
IBGS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while CE31.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE31.L iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBGS.L iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.18% | 2.39% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IBGS.L and CE31.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBGS.L and CE31.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR.
Find the right allocation for IBGS.L and CE31.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer