PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGM.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBGM.L is traded in GBP, while XGLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGM.L achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than XGLE.L's -0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IBGM.L has outperformed XGLE.L with an annualized return of 31.18%, while XGLE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.62% annualized return.


IBGM.L

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-2.35%
6M
-2.29%
1Y
0.51%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
39.50%
10Y*
31.18%

XGLE.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.83%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
-0.96%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
2.50%
5Y*
-2.15%
10Y*
0.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBGM.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-2.35%5.38%-3.53%465.78%-3.14%-9.55%20.87%117.65%2.05%4.56%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.71%5.95%-2.94%4.66%-14.01%-9.34%10.68%0.57%1.78%4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGM.L and XGLE.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2009

0.78

The correlation between IBGM.L and XGLE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGM.L
IBGM.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IBGM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XGLE.L
XGLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGM.L) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBGM.LXGLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.08

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

0.58

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

1.30

-1.29

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGM.L and XGLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBGM.LXGLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

0.47

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

-0.29

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.07

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.24

-0.03

Drawdowns

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGM.L drawdown since its inception was -26.66%, roughly equal to the maximum XGLE.L drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGM.L and XGLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGM.LXGLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.66%

-26.78%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.20%

-4.53%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.85%

-6.20%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-20.99%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.66%

-26.78%

+0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-18.89%

+13.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-10.13%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.04%

+0.80%

Volatility

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGM.L) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) at 2.02%. This indicates that IBGM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGM.LXGLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.02%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.94%

4.33%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.31%

5.58%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

193.47%

7.50%

+185.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.63%

8.54%

+130.09%

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBGM.L and XGLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGM.L vs. XGLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBGM.L nor XGLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBGM.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%1.33%2.78%79.03%13.18%0.00%8.74%63.75%0.74%0.74%0.77%1.07%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGM.L and XGLE.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBGM.L and XGLE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGM.L and XGLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer