IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L
IBGM.L (iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IBGM.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBGM.L returned 31.18%/yr vs 13.91%/yr for SWDA.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBGM.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBGM.L is traded in GBP, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBGM.L achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 10.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IBGM.L has outperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 31.18%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.91% annualized return.
IBGM.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- 1Y
- 0.51%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- 39.50%
- 10Y*
- 31.18%
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGM.L iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | -2.35% | 5.38% | -3.53% | 465.78% | -3.14% | -9.55% | 20.87% | 117.65% | 2.05% | 4.56% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.08% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 11.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGM.L and SWDA.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009 | 0.12 |
The correlation between IBGM.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (5 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBGM.L
SWDA.L
IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGM.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBGM.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.51 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 4.14 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 16.55 | -16.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBGM.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 2.66 | -2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.98 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.96 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.88 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGM.L drawdown since its inception was -26.66%, roughly equal to the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGM.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGM.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.66% | -25.58% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -6.55% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.85% | -18.50% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -18.50% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.66% | -25.58% | -1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -0.10% | -5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -3.49% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 1.64% | +1.20% |
Volatility
IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGM.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGM.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.52% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.94% | 7.29% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.31% | 10.19% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.47% | 13.30% | +180.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 138.63% | 14.50% | +124.13% |
IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGM.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBGM.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBGM.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGM.L iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 0.00% | 1.33% | 2.78% | 79.03% | 13.18% | 0.00% | 8.74% | 63.75% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 1.07% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBGM.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBGM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBGM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
IBGM.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. IBGM.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IBGM.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for IBGM.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer