PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGL vs. SPTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGL vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGL achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPTB's -0.07% return.


IBGL

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.74%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
-1.85%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPTB

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.08%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGL vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBGL and SPTB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

0.92

The correlation between IBGL and SPTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGL vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGL
IBGL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IBGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTB
SPTB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SPTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTB Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGL vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBGLSPTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.19

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.34

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

3.98

-2.40

IBGL vs. SPTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the SPTB Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGL and SPTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBGLSPTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.07

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.92

-0.86

Drawdowns

IBGL vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGL drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, which is greater than SPTB's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGL and SPTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGLSPTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-4.96%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-2.90%

-4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-1.94%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-1.32%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

0.98%

+1.91%

Volatility

IBGL vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB) at 1.11%. This indicates that IBGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGLSPTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

1.11%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

2.47%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.28%

3.64%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.53%

4.42%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.53%

4.42%

+6.11%

IBGL vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGL vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison

IBGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than SPTB's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IBGL
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF
4.70%3.52%0.00%
SPTB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF
4.20%4.23%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IBGL and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBGL has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to SPTB (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBGL dropped -9.37% vs SPTB's -4.96%.

On 1-year performance, IBGL leads with 4.56% vs 3.87% for SPTB. On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBGL has performed better with a 4.56% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBGL.

IBGL has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.20% for SPTB.

IBGL tracks ICE 2055 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SPTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGL and 0.03% for SPTB.

SPTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGL and SPTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer