IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L
IBGL.L (iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and CYGB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IBGL.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist), while CYGB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBGL.L returned -8.38%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for CYGB.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBGL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CYGB.L.
Performance
IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBGL.L achieves a -4.18% return, which is significantly lower than CYGB.L's 3.55% return.
IBGL.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- 6M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- -4.09%
- 3Y*
- -0.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- -2.49%
CYGB.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.44%
- 10Y*
- —
IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGL.L iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | -4.18% | -0.80% | -5.06% | 7.50% | -30.45% | -4.80% |
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 3.55% | 2.20% | 11.38% | 7.14% | 2.11% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGL.L and CYGB.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBGL.L
CYGB.L
IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGL.L) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBGL.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.28 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 5.18 | -5.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 11.91 | -12.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGL.L drawdown since its inception was -46.77%, which is greater than CYGB.L's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGL.L and CYGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGL.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.77% | -1.56% | -45.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -0.69% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.99% | -1.56% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.54% | -1.56% | -39.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.87% | 0.00% | -42.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -0.24% | -14.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 0.30% | +3.69% |
Volatility
IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) at 0.59%. This indicates that IBGL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGL.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 0.59% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 2.22% | +5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.44% | 2.71% | +6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 2.37% | +11.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 2.33% | +10.54% |
IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBGL.L vs. CYGB.L - Dividend Comparison
IBGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than CYGB.L's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.70% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.38% | 2.68% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBGL.L iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.83% | 3.48% | 3.23% | 2.65% | 1.28% | 0.55% | 0.73% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.32% | 1.41% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBGL.L and CYGB.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBGL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBGL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYGB.L.
IBGL.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CYGB.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. IBGL.L tracks iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist), while CYGB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBGL.L and 0.40% for CYGB.L.
Find the right allocation for IBGL.L and CYGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer